Self Help Forums

Go Back   Self Help Forums > Building > Plumbing Codes - Residential
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Plumbing Codes - Residential International Residential Code 2000 or 2003

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11   IP: 75.11.36.143
Old October 17th, 2009, 07:26 AM
Roger's Avatar
Roger Roger is offline
Senior Member 'Self Help Master with Distinction'
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,567
Default

Quote:
I would appreciate it if you would provide a copy of the rule requiring the the plastic piping to be bonded as you are concerned about. I don't see it myself in the rules. I might be learning something on this one if you would provide the copy of the rule your reference from.

You darn Hoosiers are so freakin hard headed..... every since Bobby Knight left the state seems you people have never been the same...... I challenge you to a ......


I'm not talking bonding plastic pipe... of course not... as Mark said..... I can't tell you if by construction a spa (hot tub) has the WATER bonded or not. A lot of pools don't unless you do it with a bonding device like Mark and I have explained. I can only assume that the manufacturers are addressing the new requirement for packaged spas and hot tubs.

As for all plastic plumbing the water bond must still exist somewhere whether by contact with metal in compliance with your copied section or by installing a bonding device in the plastic plumbing or eslewhere....

Have a good day....as you now sometimes it's hard to teach an old goat new tricks....cheers...



If you want the cmp response to the water bond I can provide that
Reply With Quote
  #12   IP: 70.194.86.236
Old October 17th, 2009, 08:46 AM
Wgoodrich's Avatar
Wgoodrich Wgoodrich is offline
Super Moderator

 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,115
Default

Roger, I have to admit a LITTLE BIT of hoosier hard headedness. However I believe the saying says you can't teach old DOGS new tricks. Now being an old dog I can handle but I am going to have nightmares concerning the OLD GOAT terminology. It might be a self analysis but I am sure I am much better looking than an old goat ! Then again that may be why I haven't looked in a mirror for a while, afraid I might be starting to look like an old goat. Uh.

Wg
Reply With Quote
  #13   IP: 75.11.36.143
Old October 17th, 2009, 09:55 AM
Roger's Avatar
Roger Roger is offline
Senior Member 'Self Help Master with Distinction'
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,567
Default

Well maybe 'old goat' was a little extreme but I only have your avatar to go by....HA ... BTW that avatar is several years old...

Quote:
It might be a self analysis but I am sure I am much better looking than an old goat !
That's just the politician in you! You did clean up pretty good for your campaign picture.... I would have voted for you for sure.

At any rate I'm actually thinking that we are just having a 'cool hand luke' issue with our communication.

I went over to the American spa and pool professionals website and boy are they having a lot of controversy over what constitutes water bonding for a hot tub...

Have a good day WG

Last edited by Roger : October 17th, 2009 at 09:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14   IP: 195.93.21.38
Old October 17th, 2009, 02:07 PM
mainlymojo mainlymojo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: West Yorkshire England
Posts: 88
Default

Woe

Take it easy fellahs

If your unsure about bonding the water or the pipes if their plastic then just insert a copper/stainless nipple in the watermains incomer and hot feed pipe and just bond them the adjacent circuit grounds, then the water is bonded and make sure all the circuits feeding the location containing the tub or shower are GFCI'd.

Then you have complied with the current requirements and any past requirements just incase they change them back

Martyn.

Last edited by mainlymojo : October 17th, 2009 at 02:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15   IP: 70.194.20.76
Old October 17th, 2009, 06:27 PM
Wgoodrich's Avatar
Wgoodrich Wgoodrich is offline
Super Moderator

 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,115
Default

Martyn

You are confusing the relationship of a grounding connection for the electrical system and a bonding grid system. A bonding grid system bonds any metal 4" square or larger within 5' of the hot tub or pool. This bonding grid is not designed to be part of any electrical premisis grounding system other than incidental connections through equipment. What you are discribing if I understand you right is to connect the metal parts of the hot tub to the equipment grounding using the electrical system grounding electrode to make an intentional connection to earth. This is not the intent of a bonding grid found in 680 of the NEC. A bonding grid is designed as an expotential plain so electricity can not flow from metal to metal through the water or other equipment of the hot tub or pool.

Copied section of NEC 2008 handbook commentary;

680.26 NEC commentary - As described in 680.26(A), the function of equipotential bonding differs from the primary function of bonding to meet the requirements of Article 250 in that providing a path for ground-fault current is not the function of the equipotential bonding grid and associated bonding conductors.

electrical system equipment grounding and a bonding grid aka expotential plane are two different systems used for different principles to enhance safety.

Roger, SueMarkup and I were discussing a fine point of the design of the bonding grid requirements not having the equipment grounding system of the structural electrical involved in the discussion at this time.

Wg
Reply With Quote
  #16   IP: 75.75.170.226
Old October 18th, 2009, 06:46 PM
homebild's Avatar
homebild homebild is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 167
Default Vermont Uses 2005 NEC

Vermont uses the 2005 NEC.

Hot tub water is not required to be bonded as it is with 2008 version...

Good idea?

Yes.

required?

No.

Under the International Existing Building Code, it would also be exempt from bonding requirements provided any repairs did not make it any 'less' safe than it already was...

Last edited by homebild : October 18th, 2009 at 06:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17   IP: 75.204.106.252
Old October 19th, 2009, 10:22 AM
Wgoodrich's Avatar
Wgoodrich Wgoodrich is offline
Super Moderator

 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,115
Default

There was a change between the 2005 and the 2008 NEC rules by adding the bonding of the water to the bonding grid system. The reason this was approached was a concern created due to changes in pool and hot tub design. There are pools out there now that comes like a great big plastic or fiberglass tub with no metal on contact with the water. Then concerning transient voltages and leakage in motors associated with the pool or nearby underground power cable introducing power into the nonmetallic tub. This condition sets up a person in the water to be energized without them knowing it and nowhere for the current to flow to. Bonding the water with the bonding grid that is any metal part within 5' of the hot tub or pool keeps the potential equal in hopes to keep nowhere for the current to flow. The minimum area in contact with the water is 9 square inches which would equal a 3"x3" contact metal with the water. Normally this is done naturally by an inline heater metal casing of a motor or heater etc. However there are major discussions about what is adequate contact with the water.

The new rule is a good thing in reaction to changes in the designs of the pools. Many pools even have nonconductive fiber light thus eliminating even the bonding attachement of the a wet or dry niche that would make contact with the water. Just check to see if you have contact of a minimum of 9 square inches with the water. Then you have met the 2008 being more stringent than the 2005. In a hot tub most inline heaters are about 3" in diameter and about a foot long. The water from the pool or hot tub flows through that heater as the water circulates. This would meet that rule. It really is not hard to meet that rule in the design. It is just a change to address a new concern due to nonmetallic pool and hot tub designs getting more popular.

Wg
Reply With Quote
  #18   IP: 195.93.21.38
Old October 19th, 2009, 05:06 PM
mainlymojo mainlymojo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: West Yorkshire England
Posts: 88
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wgoodrich View Post
Martyn

You are confusing the relationship of a grounding connection for the electrical system and a bonding grid system. A bonding grid system bonds any metal 4" square or larger within 5' of the hot tub or pool. This bonding grid is not designed to be part of any electrical premisis grounding system other than incidental connections through equipment. What you are discribing if I understand you right is to connect the metal parts of the hot tub to the equipment grounding using the electrical system grounding electrode to make an intentional connection to earth. This is not the intent of a bonding grid found in 680 of the NEC. A bonding grid is designed as an expotential plain so electricity can not flow from metal to metal through the water or other equipment of the hot tub or pool.

Copied section of NEC 2008 handbook commentary;

680.26 NEC commentary - As described in 680.26(A), the function of equipotential bonding differs from the primary function of bonding to meet the requirements of Article 250 in that providing a path for ground-fault current is not the function of the equipotential bonding grid and associated bonding conductors.

electrical system equipment grounding and a bonding grid aka expotential plane are two different systems used for different principles to enhance safety.

Roger, SueMarkup and I were discussing a fine point of the design of the bonding grid requirements not having the equipment grounding system of the structural electrical involved in the discussion at this time.

Wg
I stand corrected .

I know that main bonding and supplementary bonding differ somewhat. Its just I thought that north American main bonding and supplementary grounding requirements were carried out to the same standard as UK earthing arrangements EEBAD (equipotential earth bonding and automatic disconnection).

With this in mind I was referring to the recent UK 17th editon wiring regs 2008, which states that all circuits supplying equipment in a location containing a bath or shower are required to have gfci's (RCDs) installed. There is no requirement to bond extraneous metal work if this requirement has been met. but then it reads in another chapter.

Supplementary bonding of locations containing a bath or shower is required unless the following requirements have been met. the same location is required unless the following requirements are met. 701.415.2

a/ All circuits of the location meet the required disconnection times, 411.3.2.2
b/ All circuits of the location are additionally protected by 30 ma rcds, (gfci's)701.411.3.3
c/ All extraneous conductive parts within the location are effectively connected via the main protective equipotential bonding to the main earthing terminal, 411.3.1.2(main ground connection)

This is misleading because it suggests that you can supplementary bond and not bother with the gfci's.

With regards to c, an extraneous conductive part can mean a metal waste pipe connected to a bath or sink then to an internal or external metal stack or a plastic waste pipe connected to the exposed 4" square of metal waste within the location, thus introducing a ground potential therefore requiring bonding to the main earthing terminal/grounding connection as well as the gfci protection.

In the UK we also run a main equipotential bond to the water mains pipe, oil and gas pipes and gas meter, ducting, exsposed metallic structural parts of the building and lightening conductors etc. If the pipes are plastic there is also no need to bond. With regards to water, gas and oil pipes, where it feeds into the building it has to connect to the pipe within 2' of the stop **** (fawcette isolation valve) on the consumers side. With the execption that not all installations are connected to ground via a spiked electrode or buried taped grids, these are only found in remote areas where the supplies are fed overhead via poles and tranny's and the main service incomer has to be in turn protected by a 100 ma gfci as a main isolator with a time delay, then with further 30 ma rcbo's (combined gfci/mcbs) protecting further circuits.

Most incoming services have a main earth (ground) supplied by the power companies in the form of a sealed connection to the service neutral within the cutout fuse unit. And sometimes on the older supplies the lead sheaths/ wire armourings that are on the service feeder cables are used to supply main earths via an earth clamp. Both systems then in turn are fed from a sub and have one or more earth spikes connecting the substation star/wye mesh to ground.

Supplementary bonding and the main bonding arrangement has become a grey area once again with its wording, so many sparkies in the UK are still supplementary bonding whether or not its required as well as installing gfci's. That way the job will comply if they ever change it back, as some requirements from older regs have been brought back.

Also another problem that I have experienced with plastic pipe installations, is when the mains water feeding a pottable plastic water tank via a plastic pipe to feed all the house. Any continuity to ground potential is lost when the tank has stopped filling as there is no main bond to the pipe and assuming that the water is at ground potential when it is filling. The only ground connection it may have is from a water heater circuit heating a copper tank with a bad/corroded ground connection on the flex to the heater.

Case scenario.

A cast iron bath is fed from this copper tank via plastic pipes and overflows or has a leaking waste and saturates the floorboards and joists and water runs along under the floor and comes into contact with any hot connections within plastic (class 2 insulated) junction boxes. Or outlets under the floor that may feed circuits on the lower floor that in turn have non gfci;d circuits contained within them, the water if still running, the bath and the floor can potentially become live and cause the person in the bath to get a shock if they were to touch the damp wall or any surrounding surface full of condensation. As this could introduce a ground potential leakage through the fabric of the building.

If the bath had been grounded along with an insert within the plastic pipes, this could have been avoided. This actually happened to a customer of mine who had bought a house that had the wiring tested and passed. Luckily she wasn't injured when I got there, but I did measure a voltage of 130-175 volts between the saturated floor and damp walls and other surfaces. As in the UK our domestic household voltage is 230v/240v single phase.

To remedy this I supplementary bonded the bath repaired and bonded the leaking waste as it was a plastic one connected to a metal stack, and inserted copper nipples to the hot and cold pipes and bonded them also and in turn connected the bonding cable to the water heater ground which I had also repaired. The house was of masonary construction and the bathroom walls were also tiled but still, a ground potential was introduced by the general fabric of the building.

This is why I always recommend a metal nipple insert is put in the incoming feed and bathroom pipework to maintain a ground potential in the water, and main bond and supplementary bond where applicable when I do any design even if its required or not.


In addition to your discussion to grounding I am trying to find out where to purchase the NEC and the CEC to see how many harmonizations exist regarding the safety issues especially with grounding between north America and the UK. As this seems to something that keeps changing.

Regards

Martyn
Reply With Quote
  #19   IP: 75.75.170.226
Old October 22nd, 2009, 06:41 PM
homebild's Avatar
homebild homebild is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 167
Default Grace..

I applaud Wgoodrich for his gracious ability to explain without hostility the differences between the US 2005 and 2008 National Electric Code regarding swimming pool bonding....

I also applaud the gracious acceptance by Martyn to admit that UK and US standards for 'pool' bonding vary markedly....

Good Show!

To BOTH of you!
Reply With Quote
Reply






Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) 2008 Self Help and More 'All Rights Reserved'
http://www.selfhelpforums.com